Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Chris1ar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Keep, but blanked. assuming good faith this appears to be a draft page, if the editor returns they can continue their work from the history, but there is certainly no good reason to display it active anymore. — xaosflux Talk 05:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Garbage "article" on a non-notable (if it even exists) football team disguised as a userpage. Violation of WP:USERPAGE. — Ash063 22:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per WP:NFCC point #9, which states: Restrictions on location. Non-free content is used only in the article namespace; it is never used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes), portals, user pages, categories, Help, MediaWiki, or the Project namespace, except where there are exemptions. as there are definately non-free images as well as non-free content on the user page. Nat Tang ta | co | em 04:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.